|
||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
January 15th, 2008
The right way to measure new media
In the last few months as communicators have been returning from conferences on social media, I've seen a number of comments made on online networking sites that concern me. For example:
In other cases, a new tool may supplement more traditional tools, such as using a live web meeting to extend the reach of executives beyond the small number of face-to-face Town Hall meetings they can conduct. Unless we focus on the business purpose of a specific new tool as part of a broader campaign, we're going to end up measuring the wrong things about new media, for example, simple activity statistics of how many people clicked on a link, added to a wiki or responded to a blog. Instead we need to measure the contribution of these channels to improving knowledge and changing attitudes that lead to desirable new behaviors that have a financial value. Traditional measurement approaches focused on outcomes still make sense for our shiny, new media tools. See you next time. Angela Sinickas
|
Latest news and stories from Melcrum | |||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
About
Melcrum
|
||||||||||||
The Source for Communicators is
a free resource for corporate communicators from Melcrum Publishing. |
|
|